Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice: a RAND appropriateness method
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice : a RAND appropriateness method. / Saust, Laura Trolle; Siersma, Volkert Dirk; Bjerrum, Lars; Hansen, Malene Plejdrup.
I: BMJ Open Quality, Bind 12, Nr. 2, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice
T2 - a RAND appropriateness method
AU - Saust, Laura Trolle
AU - Siersma, Volkert Dirk
AU - Bjerrum, Lars
AU - Hansen, Malene Plejdrup
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of adult patients with suspected urinary tract infections in general practice.DESIGN: A Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used.SETTING: Danish general practice.SUBJECTS: A panel of nine experts, mainly general practitioners, was asked to rate the relevance of 27 preliminary quality indicators. The set of indicators was based on the most recent Danish guidelines for the management of patients with suspected urinary tract infection. An online meeting was held to resolve misinterpretations and achieve consensus.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus of appropriateness was reached if the overall panel median rating was 7-9 with agreement. Agreement was defined as: no more than one expert rated the indicator outside the three-point region (1-3, 4-6 and 7-9) containing the median.RESULTS: A total of 23 of the 27 proposed quality indicators attained consensus. One additional indicator was proposed by the panel of experts, leading to a final set of 24 quality indicators. All indicators focusing on the diagnostic process achieved consensus of appropriateness, while the experts agreed on three quarters of the proposed quality indicators concerning either the treatment decision or the choice of antibiotics.CONCLUSION: This set of quality indicators may be used to strengthen general practice's focus on the management of patients with a possible urinary tract infection and to identify potential quality problems.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of adult patients with suspected urinary tract infections in general practice.DESIGN: A Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used.SETTING: Danish general practice.SUBJECTS: A panel of nine experts, mainly general practitioners, was asked to rate the relevance of 27 preliminary quality indicators. The set of indicators was based on the most recent Danish guidelines for the management of patients with suspected urinary tract infection. An online meeting was held to resolve misinterpretations and achieve consensus.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus of appropriateness was reached if the overall panel median rating was 7-9 with agreement. Agreement was defined as: no more than one expert rated the indicator outside the three-point region (1-3, 4-6 and 7-9) containing the median.RESULTS: A total of 23 of the 27 proposed quality indicators attained consensus. One additional indicator was proposed by the panel of experts, leading to a final set of 24 quality indicators. All indicators focusing on the diagnostic process achieved consensus of appropriateness, while the experts agreed on three quarters of the proposed quality indicators concerning either the treatment decision or the choice of antibiotics.CONCLUSION: This set of quality indicators may be used to strengthen general practice's focus on the management of patients with a possible urinary tract infection and to identify potential quality problems.
KW - Adult
KW - Humans
KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care
KW - General Practice
KW - Family Practice
KW - Consensus
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis
U2 - 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002156
DO - 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002156
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37230738
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open Quality
JF - BMJ Open Quality
SN - 2399-6641
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 356083415