Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. / Imeraj, Albi; Olesen, Thomas Bastholm; Laursen, Ditte Hjorth; Søndergaard, Jens; Brandt, Carl Joakim.

In: JMIR Formative Research, Vol. 6, No. 9, e40739, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Imeraj, A, Olesen, TB, Laursen, DH, Søndergaard, J & Brandt, CJ 2022, 'Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial', JMIR Formative Research, vol. 6, no. 9, e40739. https://doi.org/10.2196/40739

APA

Imeraj, A., Olesen, T. B., Laursen, D. H., Søndergaard, J., & Brandt, C. J. (2022). Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research, 6(9), [e40739]. https://doi.org/10.2196/40739

Vancouver

Imeraj A, Olesen TB, Laursen DH, Søndergaard J, Brandt CJ. Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6(9). e40739. https://doi.org/10.2196/40739

Author

Imeraj, Albi ; Olesen, Thomas Bastholm ; Laursen, Ditte Hjorth ; Søndergaard, Jens ; Brandt, Carl Joakim. / Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. In: JMIR Formative Research. 2022 ; Vol. 6, No. 9.

Bibtex

@article{76b82f45a3444f4996f06c99df7fda7b,
title = "Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Digital health interventions are increasingly used to handle and promote positive health behaviors. Clinical measures are often used, and a certain precision is essential for digital health interventions to have an effect. Only few studies have compared clinically measured weights with self-reported weights. No study has examined the validity of self-reported weight from a mobile app used in a tailored weight loss intervention. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight collected from a mobile health lifestyle coaching program during a 12-month weight loss intervention for obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. The secondary aim was to investigate the determinants for possible discrepancies between clinically measured and self-reported weights of these patients with different demographic and lifestyle characteristics and achievements of weight loss goals. Methods: Weight registrations were collected from participants (N=104) in a Danish randomized controlled trial examining the effect of a digital lifestyle intervention on weight loss among obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Self-reported weight was measured at home and registered in the app. Results: Self-reported body weight was lower than the weight measured in the clinic after 6 months by 1.03 kg (95% CI 1.01-1.05; P<.001) and after 12 months also by 1.03 kg (95% CI 0.99-1.04; P<.001). After 6 months, baseline weight and BMI were associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.04; P=.01) and 0.09 kg (95% CI 0.02-0.17; P=.02) per increment of 1 kg and 1 kg/m2, respectively, between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Weight change during the first 6 months was also associated with a difference of 0.1 kg (95% CI 0.04-0.01; P<.001) per kilogram of difference in weight between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Participants who did not achieve the 5% weight loss goal underestimated their weight by 0.79 kg (95% CI 0.34-1.23) at 6 months. After 12 months, only baseline weight was associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.05; P=.02) per increment of kilogram between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. None of the other factors showed any significant discrepancy after 12 months. Conclusions: Self-reported weight obtained from mobile health is a valid method for collecting anthropometric measurements.",
keywords = "body weight, diabetes, digital behavioral coaching, lifestyle change, mobile intervention, obesity, patient engagement, self-report, telemedicine, validation",
author = "Albi Imeraj and Olesen, {Thomas Bastholm} and Laursen, {Ditte Hjorth} and Jens S{\o}ndergaard and Brandt, {Carl Joakim}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}Albi Imeraj, Thomas Bastholm Olesen, Ditte Hjorth Laursen, Jens S{\o}ndergaard, Carl Joakim Brandt.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.2196/40739",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "JMIR Formative Research",
issn = "2561-326X",
publisher = "JMIR Publications",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement Between Clinically Measured Weight and Self-reported Weight Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Through an mHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program in Denmark

T2 - Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Imeraj, Albi

AU - Olesen, Thomas Bastholm

AU - Laursen, Ditte Hjorth

AU - Søndergaard, Jens

AU - Brandt, Carl Joakim

N1 - Publisher Copyright: ©Albi Imeraj, Thomas Bastholm Olesen, Ditte Hjorth Laursen, Jens Søndergaard, Carl Joakim Brandt.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Digital health interventions are increasingly used to handle and promote positive health behaviors. Clinical measures are often used, and a certain precision is essential for digital health interventions to have an effect. Only few studies have compared clinically measured weights with self-reported weights. No study has examined the validity of self-reported weight from a mobile app used in a tailored weight loss intervention. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight collected from a mobile health lifestyle coaching program during a 12-month weight loss intervention for obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. The secondary aim was to investigate the determinants for possible discrepancies between clinically measured and self-reported weights of these patients with different demographic and lifestyle characteristics and achievements of weight loss goals. Methods: Weight registrations were collected from participants (N=104) in a Danish randomized controlled trial examining the effect of a digital lifestyle intervention on weight loss among obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Self-reported weight was measured at home and registered in the app. Results: Self-reported body weight was lower than the weight measured in the clinic after 6 months by 1.03 kg (95% CI 1.01-1.05; P<.001) and after 12 months also by 1.03 kg (95% CI 0.99-1.04; P<.001). After 6 months, baseline weight and BMI were associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.04; P=.01) and 0.09 kg (95% CI 0.02-0.17; P=.02) per increment of 1 kg and 1 kg/m2, respectively, between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Weight change during the first 6 months was also associated with a difference of 0.1 kg (95% CI 0.04-0.01; P<.001) per kilogram of difference in weight between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Participants who did not achieve the 5% weight loss goal underestimated their weight by 0.79 kg (95% CI 0.34-1.23) at 6 months. After 12 months, only baseline weight was associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.05; P=.02) per increment of kilogram between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. None of the other factors showed any significant discrepancy after 12 months. Conclusions: Self-reported weight obtained from mobile health is a valid method for collecting anthropometric measurements.

AB - Background: Digital health interventions are increasingly used to handle and promote positive health behaviors. Clinical measures are often used, and a certain precision is essential for digital health interventions to have an effect. Only few studies have compared clinically measured weights with self-reported weights. No study has examined the validity of self-reported weight from a mobile app used in a tailored weight loss intervention. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight collected from a mobile health lifestyle coaching program during a 12-month weight loss intervention for obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. The secondary aim was to investigate the determinants for possible discrepancies between clinically measured and self-reported weights of these patients with different demographic and lifestyle characteristics and achievements of weight loss goals. Methods: Weight registrations were collected from participants (N=104) in a Danish randomized controlled trial examining the effect of a digital lifestyle intervention on weight loss among obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Self-reported weight was measured at home and registered in the app. Results: Self-reported body weight was lower than the weight measured in the clinic after 6 months by 1.03 kg (95% CI 1.01-1.05; P<.001) and after 12 months also by 1.03 kg (95% CI 0.99-1.04; P<.001). After 6 months, baseline weight and BMI were associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.04; P=.01) and 0.09 kg (95% CI 0.02-0.17; P=.02) per increment of 1 kg and 1 kg/m2, respectively, between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Weight change during the first 6 months was also associated with a difference of 0.1 kg (95% CI 0.04-0.01; P<.001) per kilogram of difference in weight between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. Participants who did not achieve the 5% weight loss goal underestimated their weight by 0.79 kg (95% CI 0.34-1.23) at 6 months. After 12 months, only baseline weight was associated with a discrepancy of 0.03 kg (95% CI 0.01-0.05; P=.02) per increment of kilogram between clinically measured weight and self-reported weight. None of the other factors showed any significant discrepancy after 12 months. Conclusions: Self-reported weight obtained from mobile health is a valid method for collecting anthropometric measurements.

KW - body weight

KW - diabetes

KW - digital behavioral coaching

KW - lifestyle change

KW - mobile intervention

KW - obesity

KW - patient engagement

KW - self-report

KW - telemedicine

KW - validation

U2 - 10.2196/40739

DO - 10.2196/40739

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36047606

AN - SCOPUS:85139736299

VL - 6

JO - JMIR Formative Research

JF - JMIR Formative Research

SN - 2561-326X

IS - 9

M1 - e40739

ER -

ID: 335612720