Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. / Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer; Brodersen, John; Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek; Jensen, Martin Bach.
In: B M C Family Practice, Vol. 22, No. 1, 116, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study
AU - Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer
AU - Brodersen, John
AU - Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek
AU - Jensen, Martin Bach
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608
AB - BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608
KW - General practice
KW - Family medicine
KW - Primary care
KW - Point-of-Care testing
KW - Ultrasonography
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - HEALTH-CARE
KW - BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND
KW - PRACTITIONERS
KW - EXPECTATIONS
KW - ULTRASONOGRAPHY
KW - SATISFACTION
KW - PROBABILITY
KW - UNCERTAINTY
KW - REASSURANCE
KW - PHYSICIAN
U2 - 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z
DO - 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34144701
VL - 22
JO - B M C Family Practice
JF - B M C Family Practice
SN - 1471-2296
IS - 1
M1 - 116
ER -
ID: 273493920