Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. / Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer; Brodersen, John; Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek; Jensen, Martin Bach.

In: B M C Family Practice, Vol. 22, No. 1, 116, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andersen, CA, Brodersen, J, Rudbaek, TR & Jensen, MB 2021, 'Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study', B M C Family Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z

APA

Andersen, C. A., Brodersen, J., Rudbaek, T. R., & Jensen, M. B. (2021). Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. B M C Family Practice, 22(1), [116]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z

Vancouver

Andersen CA, Brodersen J, Rudbaek TR, Jensen MB. Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. B M C Family Practice. 2021;22(1). 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z

Author

Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer ; Brodersen, John ; Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek ; Jensen, Martin Bach. / Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study. In: B M C Family Practice. 2021 ; Vol. 22, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{5c70d1e658ea4687af7cc3f7fdc084a1,
title = "Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study",
abstract = "BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608",
keywords = "General practice, Family medicine, Primary care, Point-of-Care testing, Ultrasonography, Patient-reported outcome measures, HEALTH-CARE, BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND, PRACTITIONERS, EXPECTATIONS, ULTRASONOGRAPHY, SATISFACTION, PROBABILITY, UNCERTAINTY, REASSURANCE, PHYSICIAN",
author = "Andersen, {Camilla Aakjaer} and John Brodersen and Rudbaek, {Torsten Rahbek} and Jensen, {Martin Bach}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "B M C Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' experiences of the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice - a cross-sectional study

AU - Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer

AU - Brodersen, John

AU - Rudbaek, Torsten Rahbek

AU - Jensen, Martin Bach

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608

AB - BackgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care settings is increasing. Previous studies have focused on GP-reported outcomes and little is known about patients' perspectives on the use of POCUS technology within the general practice consultation. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences with POCUS in general practice within the areas where GPs have indicated that POCUS affected aspects of the consultation.MethodsA questionnaire was developed using a mixed methods sequential design. Analytical themes from interviews with GPs were converted into items in a questionnaire by the research team. The questionnaire was then further developed in several rounds of pilot tests involving both patients and GPs. The final questionnaire was used in a cohort study conducted in 18 Danish office-based general practice clinics from January 2018 to August 2018. All patients examined with POCUS were asked to complete the questionnaire on tablets immediately after their consultation.ResultsOut of 691 patients examined, 564 (81.6%) questionnaires were available for analysis. The patients reported that they were well informed about the purpose (98%) and the results (97%) of the POCUS examination; however, 29% reported that they were not informed about the difference between POCUS and an imaging-specialist's ultrasound examination. Almost all patients (99%) reported that POCUS was integrated naturally into the consultation, and 45% reported that POCUS improved the doctor-patient relationship.The majority of patients felt that they had been more thoroughly examined (92%) and taken more seriously (58%) when POCUS was part of the consultation. They felt POCUS gave them a better understanding of their health problem (82%), made them feel more secure (86%) and increased their trust in the physician's assessment (65%). Moreover, the patients reported that POCUS use improved the level of service (95%) they experienced and the quality of care (94%) in general practice.ConclusionWe found that an examination including POCUS in general practice was a positive experience overall for the majority of patients. Future research should further explore reasons for patient confidence in POCUS and whether or not the reassuring value of POCUS is valid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03416608

KW - General practice

KW - Family medicine

KW - Primary care

KW - Point-of-Care testing

KW - Ultrasonography

KW - Patient-reported outcome measures

KW - HEALTH-CARE

KW - BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND

KW - PRACTITIONERS

KW - EXPECTATIONS

KW - ULTRASONOGRAPHY

KW - SATISFACTION

KW - PROBABILITY

KW - UNCERTAINTY

KW - REASSURANCE

KW - PHYSICIAN

U2 - 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z

DO - 10.1186/s12875-021-01459-z

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34144701

VL - 22

JO - B M C Family Practice

JF - B M C Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

IS - 1

M1 - 116

ER -

ID: 273493920