The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations. / Ba-Ali, Shakoor; Jemec, Gregor B E; Sander, Birgit; Toft, Peter B; Homøe, Preben; Lund-Andersen, Henrik.
In: Danish Medical Journal, Vol. 64, No. 3, A5328, 2017.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations
AU - Ba-Ali, Shakoor
AU - Jemec, Gregor B E
AU - Sander, Birgit
AU - Toft, Peter B
AU - Homøe, Preben
AU - Lund-Andersen, Henrik
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Either a pass/fail approach or a seven-point grading scale are used to evaluate students at the Danish universities. The aim of this study was to explore any effect of the assessment methods on student performances during oral exams.METHODS: In a prospective study including 1,037 examinations in three medical subjects, we investigated the difference in the test scores between the spring- and autumn semester. In the spring semester, the students could either pass or fail the subject (pass/fail) while in the following autumn semester, the students were assessed by tiered grading (seven-point grading scale). Unknown to the students, the examiners assessed the students by the seven-point grading scale also in the spring semester. Students at the international classes who were officially assessed by the seven-point grading scale during both semesters served as control group.RESULTS: The grading scores were significantly higher among students who were aware of being evaluated with the seven-point grading scores compared with the pass/fail group (p < 0.0001). In comparison, no significant difference between the exam results was observed from the spring- to the autumn semester for the control group (p = 0.45). Moreover, the average mark was higher among the international students (mean = 10.3, on the seven-point grading scale) than in the Danish speaking classes (mean = 9.1).CONCLUSION: The seven-point grading scale seems to motivate students to yield a better performance; hence tiered-grading should probably be preferred to a simple pass/fail approach.FUNDING: none.TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Either a pass/fail approach or a seven-point grading scale are used to evaluate students at the Danish universities. The aim of this study was to explore any effect of the assessment methods on student performances during oral exams.METHODS: In a prospective study including 1,037 examinations in three medical subjects, we investigated the difference in the test scores between the spring- and autumn semester. In the spring semester, the students could either pass or fail the subject (pass/fail) while in the following autumn semester, the students were assessed by tiered grading (seven-point grading scale). Unknown to the students, the examiners assessed the students by the seven-point grading scale also in the spring semester. Students at the international classes who were officially assessed by the seven-point grading scale during both semesters served as control group.RESULTS: The grading scores were significantly higher among students who were aware of being evaluated with the seven-point grading scores compared with the pass/fail group (p < 0.0001). In comparison, no significant difference between the exam results was observed from the spring- to the autumn semester for the control group (p = 0.45). Moreover, the average mark was higher among the international students (mean = 10.3, on the seven-point grading scale) than in the Danish speaking classes (mean = 9.1).CONCLUSION: The seven-point grading scale seems to motivate students to yield a better performance; hence tiered-grading should probably be preferred to a simple pass/fail approach.FUNDING: none.TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
KW - Chi-Square Distribution
KW - Denmark
KW - Dermatology/education
KW - Education, Medical/methods
KW - Educational Measurement/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Ophthalmology/education
KW - Otolaryngology/education
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Students, Medical/psychology
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28260593
VL - 64
JO - Danish Medical Journal
JF - Danish Medical Journal
SN - 2245-1919
IS - 3
M1 - A5328
ER -
ID: 194524041